Aim
To compare the shaping ability of three different
single-file systems with Mtwo rotary instruments dur-
ing the preparation of curved root canals in extracted
teeth.
Methodology
A total of 80 root canals with cur-
vatures ranging between 25° and 35° were divided
into four groups of 20 canals. Based on radiographs
taken prior to instrumentation, the groups were
balanced with respect to the angle and the radius of
canal curvature. Canals were prepared to the follow-
ing apical sizes: Mtwo: size 30 using the single-length
technique; Reciproc, F360, and OneShape: size 25.
Using pre- and post-instrumentation radiographs,
straightening of the canal curvatures was determined
with a computer image analysis programme. Prepara-
tion time, changes in working length, and instrument failures were also recorded.
Results
During preparation, no file fractured. All
instruments maintained the original canal curvature
well with no significant differences between the
instrument systems (P = 0.792). Instrumentation
with Reciproc and OneShape was significantly faster
than with F360 and Mtwo (P < 0.05), while F360
was significantly faster than Mtwo (P < 0.05). No
significant differences were obtained regarding
changes in working length during instrumentation
with the different instruments (P = 0.784).
Conclusion
Under the conditions of this study, all
instruments respected the original canal curvature
well and were safe to use. The use of Reciproc and
OneShape instruments required less time to prepare
the curved canals compared with Mtwo and F360.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Comentários